ECtHR jurisprudence: Decision of the ECtHR from 8. 11. 2021, Dolińska-ficek and Ozimek v Poland, applications no. 49868/19 a 57511/19Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 7. 2021, Reczkowicz v Poland, application no. 43447/19Decision of the ECtHR from 29. 6. 2021, Broda and Bojara v Poland, applications no. 26691/18 a 27367/18Decision of the ECtHR from 7. 5. 2021, Xero Flor w Polsce sp. z o.o. v Poland, application no. 4907/18

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A

ECtHR jurisprudence: N/A

ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 10 European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the ECtHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 2. 2007, Krasulya v Russia, application no. 12365/03

ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 10 European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the ECtHR from 26. 9. 1995, Vogt v Germany, application no. 17851/91Decision of the ECtHR from 12. 2. 2008, Guja v Moldavia, application no. 14277/04Decision of the ECtHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95Decision of the ECtHR from 26. 2. 2009, Kudeshkina v Russia, application no. 29492/05Decision of the ECtHR from 20. 11. 2012, Harabin v Slovakia, application no. 58688/11Decision of the ECtHR from 23. 6. 2016, Baka v Hungary, application no. 20261/12Decision of the ECtHR from 2. 9. 1998, Ahmed and others v United Kingdom, application no. 22954/93Decision of the ECtHR from 14. 3. 2002, De Diego Nafria v Spain, application no. č.46833/99Decision of the ECtHR from 26. 10. 1984, De Cubber v Belgium, application no. 9186/80Decision of the ECtHR from 15. 12. 2005, Kyprianou v Cyprus, application no. 73797/01Decision of the ECtHR from 15. 9. 2009, Micallef v Malta, application no. 17056/06Decision of the ECtHR from 23. 4. 2015, Morice v Frane, application no. 29369/10Decision of the ECtHR from 1. 10. 1982, Piersack v Belgium, application no. 8692/79Decision of the ECtHR from 28. 6. 1984, Campbell and Fell v United Kingdom, applications no. 7819/77 and 7878/77Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 10. 1984, Sramek v Austria, application no. 8790/79Decision of the ECtHR from 9. 6. 1998, Incal v Turkey, application no. 22678/93Decision of the ECtHR from 6. 5. 2003, Kleyn and others v Netherlands, application no. 39343/98Decision of the ECtHR from 17. 12. 2004, Pedersen and Baadsgaard v Denmark, application no. 49017/99Decision of the ECtHR from 1. 12. 2009, Karsai v Hungary, application no. 5380/07Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 10. 2007, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens and July v France, applications no. 21279/02 and 36448/02Decision of the ECtHR from 6. 10. 2009, Kuliś and Różycki v Poland, application no. 27209/03Decision of the ECtHR from 27. 2. 2001, Jerusalem v Austria, application no. 26958/95Decision of the ECtHR from 11. 4. 2006, Brasilier v France, application no. 71343/01Decision of the ECtHR from 17. 12. 2004, Cumpănă and Mazăre v Romania, application no. 33348/96

ECtHR jurisprudence: Art. 10 European Convention on Human RightsDecision of the EctHR from 27. 5. 2014, Baka v Hungary, application no. 20261/12 Decision of the EctHR from 26. 2. 2009, Kudeshkina v Russia, application no. 29492/05Decision of the EctHR from 16. 9. 1999, Buscemi v Italy, application no. 29569/95Decision of the EctHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95

ECtHR jurisprudence: Chamber decision:Decision of the ECtHR from 10. 2. 1983, Albert and Le Compte v. BelgiumDecision of the ECtHR from 20. 5. 1998, Gautrin and Others v. FranceDecision of the ECtHR from 20. 10. 2015, Fazia Ali v. the United Kingdom, no. 40378/10Decision of the ECtHR from 1. 12. 2020, Guðmundur Andri Ástráðsson v. Iceland, no. 26374/18Decision of the ECtHR from 9. 3. 2021, Eminağaoğlu v. Turkey, no. 76521/12Decision of the ECtHR from 10. 6. 2001, Cyprus v. Turkey, no. 25781/94Decision of the ECtHR from 23. 6. 1081, Le Compte, Van Leuven and De Meyere v. BelgiumDecision of the ECtHR from 24. 11. 1994, Beaumartin v. FranceDecision of the ECtHR from 22. 10. 1984, Sramek v. AustriaDecision of the ECtHR from 9. 1. 2013, Oleksandr Volkov v. Ukraine, no. 21722/11Decision of the ECtHR from 8. 10. 2019, Grace Gatt v. Malta, no. 46466/16Decision of the ECtHR from 6. 5. 2003, Kleyn and Others v. the Netherlands, nos. 39343/98 Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 6. 1989, Langborger v. SwedenDecision of the ECtHR from 16. 12. 2003, Cooper v. the United Kingdom, no. 48843/99 Decision of the ECtHR from 28. 5. 2002, Stafford v. the United Kingdom, no. 46295/99 Decision of the ECtHR from 15. 10. 2009, Micallef v. Malta, no. 17056/06Decision of the ECtHR from 23. 4. 2015, Morice v. France, no. 29369/10 Decision of the ECtHR from 25. 9. 2018, Denisov v. Ukraine, no. 76639/11Decision of the ECtHR from 21. 7. 2009, Luka v. Romania, no. 34197/02Decision of the ECtHR from 21. 12. 2000, Wettstein v. Switzerland, no. 33958/96Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 6. 2004, Pabla Ky v. Finland, no. 47221/99Grand Chamber decision:Decision of the ECtHR from 20. 3. 2018, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia, nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12Decision of the ECtHR from 6. 11. 2018, Ramos Nunes de Carvalho e Sá v. Portugal, nos. 55391/13 and 2 othersDecision of the ECtHR from 17. 7. 2014 Centre for Legal Resources on behalf of Valentin Câmpeanu v. Romania, no. 47848/08 Decision of the ECtHR from 20. 3. 2018, Radomilja and Others v. Croatia, nos. 37685/10 and 22768/12Decision of the ECtHR from 28. 5. 2020, Farzaliyev v. Azerbaijan, no. 29620/07Decision of the ECtHR from 18. 7. 2019, Rustavi 2 Broadcasting Company Ltd and Others v. Georgia, no. 16812/17Decision of the ECtHR from 1. 6. 2021, Denis and Irvine v. Belgium, nos. 62819/17 and 63921/17

ECtHR jurisprudence: Decision of the ECtHR from 27. 5. 2014, Baka v Hungary, application no. 20261/12Decision of the ECtHR from 26. 2. 2009, Kudeshkina v Russia, application no. 29492/05Decision of the ECtHR from 16. 9. 1999, Buscemi v Italy, application no. 29569/95Decision of the ECtHR from 28. 10. 1999, Wille v Lichtenstein, application no. 28396/95Decision of the ECtHR from 17. 12. 2004, Pedersen a Baadsgaard v Denmark, application no. 49017/99Decision of the ECtHR from 22. 10. 2007, Lindon, Otchakovsky-Laurens a July v France, applications no. 21279/02 a 36448/02Decision of the ECtHR from 6. 10. 2009, Kuliś a Różycki v Poland, application no. 27209/03Decision of the ECtHR from27. 2. 2001, Jerusalem v Austria, application no. 26958/95Decision of the ECtHR from 23. 4. 2015, Morice v France, application no. 29369/10Decision of the ECtHR from 11. 4. 2006, Brasilier v France, application no. 71343/01

ECtHR jurisprudence: Decision of the ECtHR from 9. 3. 2021, Bilgen v Turkey, application no. 1571/07

ECtHR jurisprudence: On the right of access to court that extends to arbitration: Lithgow and Others v. the United Kingdom, July 8, 1986, § 201, Series A no.102; on the conditions to waive the right to court in favour of arbitration (the waiver should be free, lawful, and equivocal): R. v. Switzerland, no. 10881/84, decision of the Commission of 4 March 1987, Decisions and Reports (DR) no 51; Osmo Suovaniemi and others v. Finland (dec.), No 31737/96, 23 February 1999; Transado - Transportes Fluviais do Sado, SA v. Portugal (dec.), no.35943 / 02, December 16, 2003; more on the conditions of a waiver: Deweer v. Belgium, February 27, 1980, § 49, Series A no. 35; on necessary guarantees to be observed in mandatory arbitration: Bramelid and Malmström v. Sweden, nos. 8588/79 and 8589/79, Commission decision of 12 October 1989, DR no. 29; on references to the national rules on company law: Kohlhofer and Minarik v. Czech Republic, nos. 2921/03, 28464/04 and 5344 / 05, 15 October 2009; and in particular the relationship between stakeholders and its impact on market share: Kind v. Germany (dec.), No 44324/98, 30 March 2000.